Pricing test — validation mode

Use ContractGhost the way freelancers actually buy.

Some freelancers need contract help every week. Others only need it when a weird clause shows up. So the pricing test is simple: one-off reviews for occasional pain, monthly plans for people who review contracts often.

This page exists to test willingness to pay honestly before checkout infrastructure is live.

Pay per review

$19 one-time

Best for freelancers who only want help when a contract feels sketchy.

  • 1 contract risk review
  • Plain-English issue summary
  • Safer rewrite suggestions
  • Negotiation points to send back
I’d buy this

Pro

$29 / month

For heavier usage, agency-style workflows, or anyone who wants more frequent reviews.

  • Everything in Starter
  • Better fit for teams or subcontract-heavy work
  • Useful if contracts show up often
  • Validation target, not final packaging
I’d buy this

What this pricing test is trying to learn

  • Do freelancers prefer a one-off rescue purchase or an ongoing subscription?
  • Does “monthly” create resistance for low-frequency contract review?
  • Does a pay-per-review option increase reply rate and buying intent?

If repeated feedback says “I only need this occasionally,” pay-per-review should probably become the headline offer instead of a footnote.

Which option should lead?

If you’re a freelancer and one of these feels obviously right or obviously wrong, that’s useful signal. Reply by email and say which one you’d actually pay for, plus what kind of contracts you deal with.

Occasional projects

Probably pay-per-review. The pain is real, but not frequent enough for another subscription.

Retainers / ongoing clients

Probably monthly. The workflow is repeated, so speed and consistency matter more.

Agencies / studios

Probably Pro if multiple contracts, subcontractors, or revisions show up often.